|
|
|
THE ABUJA II
SUDANESE PEACE CONFERENCE
26 April - 17 May 1993
PRESS STATEMENT
The Second Abuja Peace Conference on the
Sudan was hosted by Nigeria, in Abuja, from 26th
April to 17th May 1993. The Conference was between
the Government of the Sudan and the Sudanese Peoples' Liberation
Army (SPLM/SPLA) (mainstream) led by Dr. John Garang. The
Government of the Sudan sent a high-powered delegation led
by Col. Mohammed Alamin, Speaker of the Sudanese Transitional
Council and includes: 1 Governor, 6 Ministers and other
top ranking officials of the Sudanese Government. The (SPLM/SPLA)
(mainstream) delegation was led by Commander Salva Kiir
Mayardit and included 12 top ranking commanders of the (SPLM/SPLA),
and a Technical Advisory team of 5 Sudanese nationals.
- The Conference was declared open by the Vice-President
of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Admiral Augustus Alkhomu
on Monday, 26th April, 1993 at the International
Conference Centro, Abuja. The purpose of Abuja II was
to consolidate the gains of Abuja I Peace Conference which
was held in this same capital from 26th May
to 4th June 1992.
- It should be recalled that at the end of that 1st
Conference both parties agreed on the need:-
- to resolve the Sudanese conflict through peaceful negotiations,
- to work towards an institutional/political arrangement
to cope with the multiple diversities of the Sudanese
nation.
- to work towards an interim arrangement aimed principally
at allaying the fears of the component parts of the Sudan
to enable the country (to) develop in an atmosphere of
peace and security and
- t consult with their principals in order to determine
the structure and character of the Interim arrangement
as well as ascertain the wishes of the people concerned.
- For the past three weeks both sides have engaged in
frank and meaningful exchanges of views on all issues
that have threatened the Unity of Sudan. We have made
considerable progress in our march towards a peaceful
resolution of the conflict. Indeed, agreements have been
reached by both parties on some areas of conflicts. Notably
amongst the areas of agreement are the following:-
- A reconfirmed commitment to achieving a just and durable
peace through negotiations.
- A continuation of the prevailing cease-fire between
the parties to allow access of relief materials tot
he war-affected areas while the talks are continuing.
- A renewed determination by both parties to continue
negotiations on the sensitive issue of State and religion.
- A commitment to the Unity of the Sudan, subject however
to continued negotiations on the kind of political arrangement
to be adopted for the future.
- A proper devolution of powers between the Central
and State Governments in such a way that there shall
be clearly defined responsibilities and function between
the Central and State governments in the Sudan. In the
interim period, there should be a fairer representation
of the component parts of the country in the institutional
arrangement of the Central Government.
- Establishment of a Cease-fire Commission.
- Establishment of a National Revenue Allocation Commission
(with Nigeria as an Observer member).
- There are however, some areas of disagreement, which
are central to the core issue of the conflict. Even on
these areas, there is agreement that talks should continue
till a meaningful and acceptable solution is found. Such
areas are as follows:-
a) STATE AND RELIGION
On this issue, the Government of Sudan's
position is as follows:
1- Sharia and customs shall be the
two main sources of legislation in the Sudan. During
the Interim period the southern states shall not be
subject to any punishments based on Sharia law and alternative
punishments shall be provided instead.
2- The central government officials
shall be subject to the laws of the State, which is
the seat of Government.
- Personal laws shall be governed by the religion or custom
of the litigants.
- Khartoum is both the country's capital and a state,
and as such it is subject to the law prevailing in Khartoum
State.
The SPLM/SPLA wants Sharia only
as a source of personal laws or in the alternative,
the introduction of pre-1983 laws in Southern Sudan
with special arrangement to cover non-northerners
resident in Khartoum.
b) DEFINITION OF THE SOUTH
The Government of Sudan knows "South"
as the three states of Bahr El Ghazal, Equatoria
and Upper Nile while SPLM/SPLA views "South"
as all the war- affected areas which in addition
to the 3 already mentioned also include, Nuba Mountains
and Ingessena.
c) SECURITY OF THE SOUTH DURING
THE INTERIM PERIOD
The SPLM wants only the SPLA as
the army in the South. The Government of Sudan fees
the Sudanese army should be in a position to operate
all over Sudan
d) COMPOSITION OF THE CEASE-FIRE
COMMISSION
The Government of Sudan wants only
the Sudanese, the SPLM/A (mainstream) and the other
factions as members, while Nigeria is to be the
sole Observer. SPLM/SPLA wants other Observers from
Kenya, Uganda, EEC and USA
e) REVENUE ALLOCATION COMMISSION
Both the Sudanese Government and
the SPLM/A agree on the establishment of a Revenue
Allocation Commission. The Government of Sudan prefers
to have a Sudanese national Chairman while SPLM/A
wants a Nigerian nominee on the commission as the
Chairman. The SPLM/A suggests that the Commission
should have 3 member each while the government of
Sudan prefers that the number to serve on the Commission
should be a subject of further negotiations.
f) JUDICIARY
The Government of Sudan wants a
partial decentralization of Judiciary to the state
but with a centralized Judicial Commission for the
appointments/recruitment, transfer, discipline,
promotion of Judges, etc., whereas the SPLM/A insists
on Control of the machinery for the appointments,
transfer, discipline, promotion of Judges etc.,
up to Court of Appeal level in the States, with
the Supreme Court serving as Appellate Courts from
the States.
g) DEVOLUTION OF POWERS
Both parties agree on the devolution
of some subject matters to both state and Central
Authorities but there are still some substantial
areas of disagreement on some subject matter.
h) SUPREMACY RULE
The Government of Sudan wants laws
of the Central Authority to be supreme in case of
conflict between the laws of the Central Authority
and the State while SPLM/A wants State laws to be
supreme.
- the two parties discussed very frankly on all these
issues. It is now felt that after 3 weeks of discussions
and having achieved some progress on some issues it
is desirable to have a recess to allow both parties
to hold further consultations with their principals
with a view to obtaining fresh directives on matters
that are still outstanding. Hence, our decision to adjourn
he talks
- I have tried to give you a full background
of the events of the past three weeks, indicating in
detail areas of agreement and areas yet to be discussed
or agreed upon. We had thought our achievements was
sufficient for a full communiqué to be signed
by both parties. Unfortunately, we were proved wrong.
A last minute hitch occurred which made it impossible
for the tow parties to agree on the content of the communiqué.
Basically disagreement was what to
do about "Residual" powers.
The SPLM/A believes that after allocating
powers to both central and state authorities, they believe
that the residual powers automatically revert to the
state. The Government of Sudan believes that the issue
of "residual" powers should be held in abeyance
and discussed at a later date. Despite all effort, our
attempt to reconcile the two parties failed.
We believe that it is better not to
signs a truncated communiqué than to sign one
that does not reflect the sum total of the work done
in the part three weeks.
7. The President, Government and people
of Nigeria have put the disposal of our brothers in Sudan
all the facilities at our disposal to assist them at arriving
at an acceptable solution to the conflict. Nigeria stands
ready to continue to help in an objective and unbiased manner,
as long as it is the wish of both parties that we continue
to do so. We remain committed to peace in the sisterly country
of Sudan.
8. I thank you all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please
note the pdf version may take a few moments to download | | | |
|
|
|